ECR 64 687
Reference code
ECR 64 687
Title
Goldcliff, Coldra, Nash and Christchurch, Monmouthshire: Copy of order
Level
Item
Date
13 July [1560]
Extent & medium
1 item
Content description
Bridgnorth, 13 July 2 Elizabeth [1560].
Paper copy of order of the Queen's Council in the Marches of Wales to [Philip Williams], plaintiff, and Charles Awbre, gent., for the defendant [William Morgan], to appear again on 8 November next when the plaintiff is to prove that Geoffrey Danyell at a court held at Goldcliff on 5 July 7 Edward VI [1551] before Wa[l]ter James Langley, his steward, granted by copy of court roll the 10 acres of meadow in brodemeade [specified in the bill] to the plaintiff to hold according to the custom of the manor for ever; also to prove that the land is copyhold land, and that it and a great part of the demesnes of the manor have customarily been leyt by bopy according to the custom of the manor; and that Wa[l]ter James was steward at the time.
Endorsed: Roger Daniel plaintiff 10 Acres in Brodemead & 8 2 Eliz An order from the Commissioners for both parties to appeare
(Roger Daniel appears to be wrong but none of the documents is wholly clear on the identity of plaintiff and defendant.)
Paper copy of order of the Queen's Council in the Marches of Wales to [Philip Williams], plaintiff, and Charles Awbre, gent., for the defendant [William Morgan], to appear again on 8 November next when the plaintiff is to prove that Geoffrey Danyell at a court held at Goldcliff on 5 July 7 Edward VI [1551] before Wa[l]ter James Langley, his steward, granted by copy of court roll the 10 acres of meadow in brodemeade [specified in the bill] to the plaintiff to hold according to the custom of the manor for ever; also to prove that the land is copyhold land, and that it and a great part of the demesnes of the manor have customarily been leyt by bopy according to the custom of the manor; and that Wa[l]ter James was steward at the time.
Endorsed: Roger Daniel plaintiff 10 Acres in Brodemead & 8 2 Eliz An order from the Commissioners for both parties to appeare
(Roger Daniel appears to be wrong but none of the documents is wholly clear on the identity of plaintiff and defendant.)
Location of this record in the archive hierarchy
Click the hyperlinked text below for further details.
(Click here to scroll to the current record within the hierarchy)
Number 694 of 732 at this Level
Beneath this record in the archive hierarchy
None